Please rate these unmoderated submissions. Your voting determines what we include in the site! Feel the power!
|
In Roman Numerals, it is normally correct not to repeat more than 3 consecutive identical numerals... however, an exception is made for 4, which is, and you can look historically at the ancient romans, CORRECTLY written IIII, and INCORRECTLY as IV.
|
|
Clock s shitting bricks?
MEH!
|
|
IIII for 4 n the v are upside down
|
|
All "Tissot" watches have 4 ike IIII not IV
|
|
ITS THE SHADOW OF THE BIG HAND
|
|
its missin a finger
|
|
The reason why 4 is IIII on old clocks is that you can make all numbers with: 20 I, 4 X and 4 V. Metal was melted in moulds like XVIIIII. 4 of them allowed to have a complete set of letters for a clock. It was the cheapest and most convenient way to get all the letters. Sorry for poor English.
|
|
okay retards, the 6 is correct it's just upside down, all of the numerals bottoms are towards the inside of the clock
|
|
I have a roman numeral clock with IIII as '4' and its fine....theres nothing wrong here
|
|
I II III IIII WTF? Love romans
|
|
there is no arrow showing seconds
|
|
I LOLED AT NUMBER 4
|
|
Hey guys, chill about the damn numbers! its the shadow of the big hand. now you can all get some rest.
|
|
9 n 11 r the same, dey just backwards
|
|
The sad thing is, I have a watch just like that. o_o It's like..WTF? Lazy asses.
|